MONEY
MYSTERIES - Asset rebalancing is a magical investment technique..!
by Mr.
Dhirendra Kumar, Valueresearchonline.com
Asset rebalancing is a
magical investment technique that has an unfair reputation of being complicated
and difficult to implement, says Dhirendra Kumar.
Many investors have not
even heard of asset allocation and asset rebal ancing.
Those that have, often
as sume that these are complicated beasts which they cannot possibly understand
or use. Nothing could be further from the truth.
These ideas are not only
simple and useful, understanding them will also help you make better investing
decisions.
As for the difficulty in
understanding, let me solve that problem for you in a few minutes.
Read these 3 points
carefully:
1. Broadly, there are
two types of financial investments, equity (shares) and fixed income (deposits,
bonds, etc).
2. Equity has higher
potential gains and more risk, while fixed income gives lower but steady gains.
Depending on your needs,
you should invest in the two in a particular proportion. This proportion, and
the process of arriving at it, is called asset allocation.
3. As time goes by, equity and fixed income
gains grow at different rates, thus disrupting the desired asset allocation.
Shifting money between
the two to restore that allocation is called asset rebalancing. That's all.
So, are their any actual
benefits, or is this just nice theory? To find the answer, look at the
accompanying graph.
You will see that with
annual rebalancing, as I have described above, having 40% or / 60% equity is a
great option. The returns are higher, and yet there is much lower volatility.
No tice that Rs. 10,000
grew to Rs. 58,600 at 60% equity, faring much better than pure equity.
In fact, pure equity was
the worst of the lot. When the markets fall, the 40% and 60% allocations fall
much less than the 80% or pure equity options.
They also rise less when
the markets recover, but that's fine because they took less of a dip in the
first place.
This lower volatility
has financial advantages, but more importantly, it also has tremendously
beneficial psychological implications. It ensures that when the markets crash,
you are much more likely to stay invested.
Going by the example
shown in the graph, if you had invested in pure equity, during the crash of
2008-09, you would have lost nearly two-third (63%) of your value, from the
peak of the market in January 2008 to the bottom in March 2009.
However, in the 40%
equity option, your losses would have been limited to about 23%.
To understand the
mechanism of how this works, you can probe a little deeper than the simplified
version above.
The basis for asset
allocation is that the two types of financial assets equity and debt are
fundamentally different.
But they are also
complementary. In terms of the conflicting need of investments to give high
returns and high safety, each plays a role that compensates for the other's
deficiencies.
Let's see how this
happens.
There are just three (3)
ways that an investment can make money.
1. By lending money to
someone who pays interest on it, be it a business or the government.
2. By becoming a part-owner
of a business, as in having a share in it.
3.By buying something
that becomes more valuable, like gold or / real estate or indeed, any
possession.
Equity grows faster than
debt (which includes all kinds of deposits), but is much more volatile.
There are times when it
will rise much faster than debt, and there are times when it will grow slower,
or even fall. It turns out that the best way to protect yourself and take
advantage of the fact is to decide on a percentage balance between equity and debt,
and sticking to it by periodically shifting money away from the one that
becomes high to the one that becomes low.
|
When equity is growing
faster than fixed income--which is what you would expect most of the time--you
would periodically sell some equity investments and invest the money in fixed
income so that the balance would be restored.
When debt starts
lagging, you would periodically sell some of your fixed income and move it into
equity.
Inevitably, things
revert to a mean, and that means when equity starts lagging, you have taken out
some of your profits and moved them into a safe asset.
The effect of this, as
you can see from the accompanying graph, is almost magical.
Volatility, the bugbear
of equity investing, is toned down and returns are hardly affected. While this
sounds like hard work to implement, in truth, it is not.
No comments:
Post a Comment