Investors typically tend to pick a
fund that has delivered the highest return in its category in the past.
But can the past point-to-point
performance of the fund be the only factor in your choice of funds?
What if the fund under performed the
year after you picked it?
While looking at the past performance of the fund is important,
one also needs to look if the risks taken to achieve those returns were worth
it.
Rather than take very high risks in the hope
of high returns (such risks can also result in steep falls) or / settle for
poor returns because of risk aversion, an investor can always have a balance
between the two by going for funds with consistent performance.
That is look for funds that do not
have sharp swings in performance.
One of the several metrics to test
consistency is standard deviation. Higher the standard deviation of a fund
greater is its variation in returns from its mean.
If you can get above-average returns
with less volatility, chances are that you will build wealth optimally.
Standard deviation
as a measure of volatility
If a fund can provide you
above-category returns for lower volatility, it can provide stability to your
portfolio.
The standard deviation of a fund
needs to be seen in comparison with either its benchmark or its peer funds.
If two funds perform similarly but
one has a lower standard deviation, then the one that can deliver you similar
returns for lower volatility is clearly preferable.
In general equity funds tend to have
higher volatility and hence exhibit higher standard deviation compared with
debt funds, as the former carries higher risks.
There are also more factors at play
that influence the equity market than the debt market. Besides, the relatively
high liquidity in equity also results in more volatility in their prices.
Let us look at the table below to
understand the standard deviation and the impact on returns.
The first two funds (in the above
table) from the Franklin MF and HDFC MF stable are multi-cap / diversified
equity funds.
You can see HDFC Equity sporting a
higher standard deviation but delivered very high returns (the maximum returns
over a rolling 1-year period, taken for last 5 years is higher for HDFC
Equity).
However, it can also be seen that
the same fund did not contain declines that well (see minimum returns).
As a result its rolling average is
actually lower than Franklin India Prima Plus. Look at the standard deviation
and you will know how the high swings has resulted in not only high returns but
greater falls as well.
Similarly, the mid-cap space, if you
compare HDFC Mid-Cap Opportunities with Sundaram Select Midcap you will find
the later losing out as a result of higher volatility (standard deviation).
Debt funds, on the other hand have
delivered lower returns and have lower standard deviation.
The deviation from the mean (whether
it is maximum or minimum returns) is also not high.
Among those funds, you will see the
MIP fund, which has small dose of equities has slightly higher standard
deviation.
The short-term debt fund is less
volatile while the ultra-short fund (UTI Treasury Advantage) hardly has any
volatility and is very stable. Of course, even within these funds, the
deviation between them can vary but the difference is not as high as with
equity funds.
While picking a fund in a particular
category it is always a better idea to choose a fund with a lower standard
deviation even if it comes at the cost of a few percentage points of lower
performance, as long as the returns have been consistent and above category
averages. The same logic can be applied while constructing a portfolio as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment