How do debt funds deliver returns?
From FundsIndia.com
Now, let’s understand how debt funds make
their returns. Once that is done, it’s easy to see how risks in debt funds come
up and how to manage it.
Capital appreciation
Bonds are traded on
the market just like equity (share), though the debt market is nowhere near as
liquid and all bonds aren’t listed.
Now, a bond carries a
specific interest rate or coupon. If interest rates move lower, new debt
instruments issued will consequently have lower interest rates. But older
instruments that are already issued still carry the old – and higher – interest
rate making them more attractive than new instruments. Therefore, their prices
move up.
Take, for example, a bond with a face
value of Rs. 100 and an interest rate of 10%. Then say interest rates moved
down and new bonds issued carry an interest rate of 9%.
The old bond, in order to bring its
yields in line with the new rate, will see its price move up to about Rs. 110.
If a debt fund holds this bond, it will see its NAV rise as the bond rises. The
reverse happens when interest rates go up.
Bond prices will move down, in turn
lowering debt fund NAV.
Now, the debt fund can sell bonds when
prices rally; that is, it gains from capital appreciation of the bond.
Such price changes are the most in
government bonds as these are the most liquid. When debt fund managers
anticipate a downward rate cycle, they usually up holdings of long-term
government bonds and make neat gains through capital appreciation. In a static
or upward rate cycle, they can move into short-term debt.
The strategy of playing the interest
rate cycle is called a duration strategy. Dynamic bond funds (long-term funds)
are the ones that typically do this, actively juggling their portfolios between
long-term and short-term, corporate or government debt. Gilt funds also follow
duration, which is why they work well only when rates fall.
So what’s the risk here?
One, these funds have higher
volatility as they are driven by bond price changes. Prices react to interest
rate changes, potential government borrowing, foreign inflow, and the like.
Two, the duration call can take a
longer time to play out than expected (this is what has been happening for the
past several months, affecting funds following a duration strategy). So if
you’re holding such funds, don’t be spooked by volatility in returns.
Income accrual
The second way a debt
fund makes its returns is through holding the bonds and accruing the interest
due on them.
This is called an
accrual strategy. They aim at delivering returns across rate cycles and do not
bet on directional changes in interest rate as duration funds do or actively
trade their debt instruments.
Liquid funds,
ultra-short term funds, and most short-term funds follow such a strategy.
Sometimes, short-term funds may pull a duration play, but they will not get
into it as much as long-term dynamic bond funds.
Typically, fund managers will look for
bonds that provide them the best yield. Higher-yielding instruments are mostly
in corporate debt. When interest rates are moving south – as it is starting to
now – it gets harder to have a high portfolio yield.
Funds may thus start looking at lower
credit-quality companies (recall our explanation on credit risk last week) to
generate higher returns.
So what’s the risk here, other than
payment delays? A change in the company’s fundamentals can either improve or
worsen the credit rating of a company. When the credit rating is lowered, the
company will have to pay higher rates if it is to borrow as it becomes riskier.
This higher risk perception and the
fact that the existing bonds have lower rates results in a mark-down of the
bond’s value.
The fund’s NAV will thus reduce as the
fund adjusts the value of its holding to the new value, or / marks it to market
as it is officially termed.
This is what happened recently to
funds from the Franklin and ICICI stables as steel major JSPL, which was widely
held by these two AMCs, was downgraded by rating agencies.
When downgrades are steep, as it
happened with Amtek Auto last year and JSPL now where the downgrade was 2-3
notches, the mark down in value is greater.
But here’s the important point. The
NAV change is a result of fall in bond prices or book value only – it’s
notional.
The fund may still hold the bond. A
credit downgrade does not mean the company has completely defaulted on its
payments or even that default is definite. It’s just that the risk has moved
up.
If the company continues to pay the
interest and principal payment, the fund will recover its entire investment.
The loss in NAV due to market price
will then neutralise eventually after the bond matures. Unless the fund manager
sees a risk of default or further downgrades, such bonds will continue to be
held in the portfolio. All you have to do wait it out.
The reverse can also happen; a company
can see a credit rating upgrade. Its existing bonds carry higher interest rates
and the lower risk perception sends bond prices higher.
The fund’s NAV will therefore move up
as it marks to market. The fund can book capital appreciation in such cases.
Even if the fund held an unlisted instrument, it will enjoy higher coupon in
such a bond (as it entered earlier), as fresh issues would come at lower rates.
So, understand the kind of credit risk
you are taking. If you cannot, stick to funds that invest in top-rated debt
only, even if you are a long-term investor.
Remember, debt funds,
like equity funds, require specific time-frames for investing. If you have a horizon
of two years or lower, stick to short-term funds, ultra short-term funds, or /
liquid funds.
Go for long-term debt
funds only if your horizon is longer than at least two years.
No comments:
Post a Comment