PF Investments in Share Market: Too Little, Too Late..!

 by Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, Value Research

The Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) will start investing a tiny incremental amount in equity ETFs this month. Yawn.

Soon, within this month in fact, the EPFO could begin investing in equity assets. This should be a turning point for EPFO.

If implemented properly , equity returns could be the change from dooming EPFO beneficiaries to old age poverty to enabling decent returns on retirement savings.

According to what the labour ministry has said, equity investments will commence in July and the equity exposure will go up to 5% by the end of the financial year.

According to the finance ministry's new norms, 5% is the minimum equity exposure that EPFO must have. This can go up to a maximum of 15%.
There is no shortage of people who are proclaiming that the government is forcing EPFO to gamble away the hard-earned savings of employees. I'm surprised at how widespread the underlying sentiment is.
Dhirendra Kumar, Value Research.
From the fear mongering that is going on, one would think that the EPFO will immediately deploy its corpus to leveraged day trading in derivatives. In fact, I came across an article on this issue from an otherwise balanced publication with the hashtag # financial derivatives!

That's misleading misinformation. The small amount of equity exposure that EPFO funds will have are limited to ETFs. ETFs share none of the high-risk characteristics of derivatives.

In any case, this name-calling always avoids the main point of the logic of equity investing for PF funds.

The return offered by EPFO is too low to give any kind of realistic re turn over and above the inflation rate.

Constrained by the fixed income investment mandate, the returns have barely kept pace with inflation. When you take rising prices into account, fixed income returns are the worst form of retirement savings.

They ensure, without any doubt whatsoever, that the saver will just get back the actual value that he or she invested, without any gains whatsoever.

The risk that critics talk about are based on the casual impression of volatility . Equities may be volatile, but over any investment over a few years, the volatility gets more than compensated for by returns. Take the last ten years, for example.

One lakh rupees in EPF have increased Rs.  2.48 lakh.to  However, Rs. 1 lakh in a Nifty ETF would have been Rs. 3.9 lakh. Do note that these ten years have seen the worst financial crisis in a generation as well as a long period of stagnation.

This kind of a difference between returns would make the difference between a saver starting retired life in prosperity versus always struggling to make ends meet.

But, of course, this is not going to happen. The actual quantum of equity exposure is useless.

The norms say that the EPFO must invest between 5% and 15% of incremental investment in equity ETFs. No assets will be taken out of fixed income and then redeployed into equity.

At this rate, it could take a decade or more for the equity exposure to reach 5% or more. And, even then, a 5% exposure is the worst of both worlds.
When equity markets drop, the usual suspects will cry themselves hoarse about the losses, but when the markets rise, the tiny exposure to equity means that gains that are meaningful to savers will be hard to come by . 

Equity exposure will not serve the purpose unless it is in the 30% to 50% range.

That might sound like sacrilege in the context of EPFO, but equity exposure of that scale is already available in some of the plans of the National Pension System (NPS).


And that actually points to the logical solution to India's retirement savings mess -dissolve the EPFO and merge it into the NPS.

About the author
Mr. Dhirendra Kumar is CEO at Value Research. 

Share:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Recent Posts

Featured Post

IT Index down by -2% Gold stays positive. 

IT Index down by -2% Gold stays positive.  *Market Update: IT Index May Fall on Monday* *Why?* *Fed Rate Cut Concerns:* The U.S. Federal Res...