By Mr. Shirish B Patel, Urban Planner
The basic urban
planning instrument in Maharashtra is the Maharashtra Regional & Town
Planning Act, 1966 (MR&TP Act). Other states have similar acts.
They call for the
preparation of an existing land use plan, followed by forecasts of what the
situation will be 20 years from now: population growth, migration, job growth
and what kind of jobs, incomes and income distribution, travel demand and by
what mode of transport. Based on this anticipation of what the future holds,
the planner draws up a land use plan showing residential, commercial and
industrial areas, open spaces, schools, hospitals and other amenities.
The development
plan is, thus, essentially a land use plan designed to fit a particular
imagined future. It is presumed that this kind of land use regulatory control
is all that is needed to make that future happen. Unbelievable as it may seem,
it is drawn up without reference to any kind of transportation plan. That is
someone else's responsibility.
And naturally, it
is no surprise that the anticipated future does not happen. Invariably, after
repeated cycles of such plans, every country has found that the reality, 20
years down the line, is far from what was anticipated.
No wonder, the
planners have an impossible task. There are too many parameters outside their
control.
They have no way
of anticipating how the world around them will change - how the economy will
develop, what differences new technology will bring, or how larger policy
changes will impact development.
Shirish B Patel, Chairman Emeritus Shirish Patel & Associates (SPA) |
So, the process
has been abandoned all over the world. But not in India, where a law, now
nearly 50 years old and still faithfully followed, was drawn up based on a
former British planning practice - which Britain has long since abandoned,
moving to a more pragmatic scheme of basic strategy plans followed by
undertaking core development projects.
A development plan
for Greater Mumbai is currently under preparation. Following the publication of
existing land use, we now have a document called "Preparatory
Studies", published in late 2013. In a welcome departure from the minimum
requirements of the MR&TP Act, the document defines the basic goals that
are expected to determine the direction of the development plan.
Admittedly, these
are tucked away towards the end of the document, instead of being declared up
front, as they should be, but at least this acknowledges the centrality of
articulating one's goals before going about the preparation of a plan.
But in this large
volume (279 pages) of Preparatory Studies, there is no mention, or critical
examination, of a number of policies that deeply impact the urban situation but
fall completely outside the scope of a traditional land use development plan
and its building control regulations. The most important of these in Mumbai
are:
The Rent Control Act;
* The policy of
free housing for slum dwellers;
* The use of
transferable development rights on a large scale without considering their
impact on the
city;
* The policy of
granting floor space index increases without reference to infrastructure,
crowding of amenities, or viable densities;
* The and decisions to implement projects randomly,
without reference to planning - for example, the numerous flyovers built by the
Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation, the skywalks and the proposed
Western Coastal Road.
Yet another
significant flaw is the exclusion of large tracts of land from the purview of
the plan. Slums are excluded - 3,404 hectares of slum areas form 8.2 % of
Greater Mumbai's total land area, and 32.9 % of its residential area.
Similarly, there
are areas that come under various special planning authorities. These include
the Backbay Reclamation Area, Wadala Truck Terminal, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Oshivara
District Centre, Gorai Uttan Tourism Zone, Dharavi Redevelopment Project, and
the Santacruz Electronics Export Processing Zone, among others. These areas
total 4,322 hectares, or / 9.45 % of Greater Mumbai's total land area.
So, this is a kind
of pock-marked planning with large holes cut out of the planning area and
handed over to independent authorities to do what they like.
In Preparatory
Studies, three key goals are set out:
- competitive city,
- inclusive city and
- sustainable city.
Other goals are
conceivable, and one would think an important option to consider is
high-mobility city: where people from all income groups can move around easily
from one part of the city to another. Rapid transit and reduced commuting time
are important goals towards improving the quality of urban life. Another
possible goal is cultural city, in which we encourage both the growth of spaces
where cultural events can happen as well as easy access to those places.
What about healthy city?
Or education city?
All these suggestions
relate to the quality of life as experienced by its citizens.
Preparatory
Studies says "…the Development Plan is largely a spatial plan…." This
statement encapsulates the fatal flaw that undermines and vastly diminishes the
value of this particular planning exercise.
Instead of asking
"What does good planning demand?" the starting point is "What
does the law demand?"
That law, the MR &
TP Act of 1966, wisely does not say that you cannot do more than what is spelt
out in the Act. There is nothing in the law that precludes our expanding the
planning process to encompass whatever else we now know also needs to be done.
First, we need to
articulate our goals, and start with a consensus on these. They have been
articulated but alternative goals are possible, and there has been no process
of reaching a consensus before we move on. In particular, our goals should
focus on what people want, not what planners want.
These goals then
translate into a strategy plan: a definition of broad policies as well as
particular major projects that will take us towards these goals. Alternative
policies and projects are evaluated against the desired goals and a final
selection is made.
Accompanied by a financing
plan & an implementation plan, these then constitute the next stage of
wide-ranging consultation to establish a base of broad consensus for the more
detailed work that will follow at a subordinate planning level.
Let us hope that
other states in the country will learn from the mistakes Mumbai is making, and
adopt more sensible approaches to urban planning - we need a central
co-ordinator for urban plans, integrating land use, transport, the full
spectrum of urban policies, the deployment of resources, and priorities.
If this is to be
the urban development department of the state government, so be it. At least
then, we will have one agency that can be held accountable for the entirety of
urban outcomes.
About the
author..!
Mr. Shirish is Chairman Emeritus of Shirish Patel & Associates (SPA). Shirish B Patel founded
Shirish Patel & Associates, one of India's leading Civil Engineering
consultancy firms, which this year celebrates 50 years since it started.
Mr. Patel is a Civil Engineer with interests that extend to the
engineering design of public works, notably dams, bridges, and marine
structures; urban planning and urban affairs; the planning of factories, and
other complexes that benefit from an inter-disciplinary approach; solar energy
research; and software development.
He
founded the firm, in 1960. It is owned and managed by professionals, with the
route to becoming an Associate open to every engineer in the office. Now
numbering nearly 70, the entire staff is profit-sharing, from the
lowest-salaried employee to Associate.
No comments:
Post a Comment